Examining the Claims Surrounding Arkansas’ Issue 2: A Comprehensive Fact-Check
As voters in Arkansas prepare for the November 2024 ballot, Issue 2 has emerged as a significant topic of discussion, particularly regarding its implications for casino licensing in the state. The proposed amendment seeks to empower local voters with the authority to decide on casino licenses in their counties, thereby revoking the previously awarded license in Pope County and ensuring future licenses can only be granted with local approval. In light of the heated discourse surrounding this proposal, 5NEWS has undertaken to fact-check various claims made by both supporters and opponents of the amendment, clarifying the facts for voters.
The Context of Issue 2
Under the current framework, casinos have been authorized in specific counties across Arkansas due to the statewide approval of Amendment 100 back in 2018. This amendment led to the establishment of casinos in West Memphis, Hot Springs, Jefferson County, and Pope County. However, the local referendum showed that Pope County strongly opposed this proposition, with 61% voting against the amendment.
A Significant Shift in Power
If Issue 2 is approved, it will fundamentally change how casino licensing operates in Arkansas. The amendment mandates that no county can have a casino license if its local voters reject the measure. This critical provision ensures that local opinion reigns supreme in such pivotal decisions, contrasting with previous processes where the Arkansas Racing Commission held unilateral power in issuing licenses.
Claims from Supporters: Local Voters in Charge (LVC)
Claim 1: Voters in Pope County Rejected Casinos
Supporters of Issue 2, specifically the group Local Voters in Charge (LVC), argue that the rejection of casinos in Pope County underscores the need for local voter control. They highlight that, despite the statewide approval of Amendment 100, Pope County’s residents decisively voted against it. Scott Hardin, the communications director for the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, emphasizes that while the overall initiative passed at the state level, the local results show a clear opposition in Pope County.
Claim 2: Out-of-State Lobby Influence
Another claim made by LVC asserts that out-of-state gambling lobbyists are trying to impose a casino on Pope County, particularly pointing to the awarding of the local casino license to Cherokee Nation Entertainment (CNE) based in Oklahoma. While CNE has been involved in the region, the involvement of Choctaw Casino in nearby Pocola, Oklahoma, which has invested over $5 million in support of Issue 2, complicates this narrative. Hardin notes that while both organizations are from outside Arkansas, Cherokee Nation Entertainment has established a physical presence in the area, which mitigates some accusations of outsider influence.
Claims from Opponents: Investing in Arkansas
Claim 1: Local Support for the Casino
Those opposing Issue 2, chiefly the group Investing in Arkansas, maintain that there is substantial local support for a casino in Pope County. They cite endorsements from the Pope County Quorum Court and local mayors as evidence of community backing for the project. Hardin attests that the resolution supporting Cherokee Nation Entertainment was passed by the quorum court in 2023, which is vital for the licensing process.
Claim 2: Economic Benefits from Casino Tax Revenue
The opposition also argues that repealing casino licenses would hinder essential funding for local needs, including first responders and educational institutions. Per Amendment 100, casinos are required to pay significant taxes that can benefit local governance. Specifically, they stipulate an 8% tax to the county where the casino operates and 13% on revenue exceeding $150 million within a year.
Claim 3: Job Creation Risks from Issue 2
Finally, opponents assert that voting in favor of Issue 2 would result in substantial job losses and deter millions in investment from Arkansas. Hardin clarified that the potential job increase would stem from Cherokee Nation Entertainment’s commitment to building and operating the casino in Pope County, which could bring efficient funding directly to the county upon development.
Conclusion: Informed Decision-Making
Amid the backdrop of Arkansas’ evolving political landscape regarding casino regulations, Issue 2 presents a pivotal opportunity for voters to assert local control over gambling decisions. The claims made by both sides highlight the complexities and nuances of this issue, emphasizing the need for stringent fact-checking. As the November 2024 ballot approaches, Arkansas voters will need to weigh these claims carefully, ensuring they make informed decisions that reflect their community’s desires and best interests.
For those interested in following the developments leading up to the election, 5NEWS continues to provide updates and engage in thorough reporting on this and related topics. Voters are encouraged to stay informed, engage in discussions, and ultimately participate in shaping the future of gambling in their state.
